Acrostichum spp.

Acrostichum aureum (Thailand). The larger mangrove fern (Paku laut) may reach a height of 4 meters at certain parts of the mangroves, especially nearer the terrestrial portion. Photo by Wan Hong.

Introduction

The genus Acrostichum, with three species, is the only terrestrial fern growing in the mangrove ecosystem.  A. aureum is also the only mangrove found in both the Indo West-Pacific (IWP) and American East-Pacific (AEP) areas 1. In Central America, the Caribbean, and south Florida, A danaeifolium is found in sunny, “somewhat saline” to freshwater swamps, but not generally in coastal or mangrove areas.  In the same region, A. aureum is associated with the coastal, shaded saline and mangrove habitats although it, too, can grow happily and rapidly in freshwater lake and canal margins.2  Indeed, a supply of freshwater, even in the mangrove areas, is critical, especially for sexual reproduction; the gametophytic generation appears to be much less salt tolerant than the sporophytic.3

In the IWP, A. speciosum is a rapidly growing species found in the intermediate estuarine and high intertidal zones, and in freshwater. On the Daintree River (Queensland), its range extends from nearly to the mouth, upriver as far as 12 km.1 It may be more tolerant of saltwater inundation than A. aureum.  In all, these characteristics contribute to it being considered opportunistic and a colonizer of disturbed areas.

Acrostichum aureum, the larger mangrove fern, on Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Photo by R. Aquilar.

In Puerto Rico, both salinity and sun exposure are important factors determining A. aureum size and density.3 Under low salinity conditions, plants are larger in full sun, while at higher salinity, they grow better in the shade of tree mangroves, possibly because of lower evaporative demand.3

While knowledge of physiology is certainly not a prerequisite for deciding to sequence the genome or transcriptome of a new species, in the case of eXtreme plants, it can be a powerful force in deciding what to do with the results.  This is certainly the case for mangroves in general, and for Acrostichum in particular, the Puerto Rico study suggests a number of worthwhile projects.  For example, as leaf osmotic potentials decrease with increasing salinity, the major solutes responsible are Na+, Mg2+ and sucrose. However, Na+ levels clearly indicate one of the better exclusionary capacities for a mangrove; the leaf Cl/Na+ ratios are consistently higher in A. aureum (2.5) compared to the trees, Laguncularia racemosa (1.2) and Rhizophora mangle (1.5). Na+/K+ ratios are also lower in the fern (0.4) compared to the trees (greater than 2). These results indicate well-developed mechanisms for ion selectivity and water filtration at the root level, the molecular basis for which is unclear in any species.

Comparing leaves in saline (>30‰) and oligosaline (<5‰) environments, Na+, Mg2+ and sucrose concentrations increased 1.3, 2.8 and 1.8 fold. However, the putative “compatible osmoticum”, cyclitol D-1-0-methyl-muco-inositol, showed the greatest relative increase, 4.9 fold; under saline conditions, its concentration reached >25% of the sucrose level.  All of these changes are significant enough that there must be an accompanying complex but decipherable network of transcriptome level changes.

Next…

Genomic resources

PubMed resources

Concluding thoughts

Bibliography for the backstory

1.
Duke NC, Ball MC, Ellison JC. Factors Influencing Biodiversity and Distributional Gradients in Mangroves. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters. 1998;7(1):27. doi: 102307/2997695
2.
Acrostichum. Flora of North America. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=100407. Accessed July 22, 2017. [Source]
3.
Medina E, Cuevas E, Popp M, Lugo AE. Soil Salinity, Sun Exposure, and Growth of Acrostichum aureum, the Mangrove Fern. Botanical Gazette. 1990;151(1):41-49. doi: 101086/337803
4.
Zhang Z, He Z, Xu S, et al. Transcriptome analyses provide insights into the phylogeny and adaptive evolution of the mangrove fern genus Acrostichum. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1). doi: 101038/srep35634